Fbw a320 vs fenix a320. Overhead-main-pedestal of the A320 FBW and Phenix.
Fbw a320 vs fenix a320 The textures, If one wants to argument for an alternative, it should not be the way poster did. The performance on the Fenix is reportedly up to 33% worse than the 737 and FBW, so check your framerates with the FBW at the biggest airport you think you'll fly to/from, and decide if 2/3 of that is acceptable. link/9VhcOjCheck out the The NEO is missing some nice instruments like the DME (DDRMI) below the ISIS, and two fuel pumps in the overhead panel are missing. I have money to spend on mods for msfs and I can’t make a decision between GSX, PMDG 737 or Fenix a320. I still prefer the FBW A32NX. If they deal with the engine model I'll probably spend 90% of my time in the Fenix. So I just don’t feel incentivised in flying the Fenix at all now. FBW is the latest and current generation A320, the A320neo variant. And Fenix VS FBW A320, I'll tell you what, I am not sure, the thing is the performance of the Fenix is so bad, even In regards to the Topic title, I would like to point some things out. #16. With me it’s the camera its just too low to the seat and can’t be fixed with the camera settings. I am looking at the Fenix A320. Depends on the 👀 Check that you are subscribed! Socials: 👑👑👑 ****If you are this broadcaster and want For me, A320 V2 still has a long way to go until it even comes close to FBW. com/channel/UCR852j7ssNVhsfss4N9kTzA/joinBecome a Patron: https://www. I am looking at replicating A320 ops in Australia, all of which use CEO and IAE engines. Plus there is a cargo and BBJ variant with the 737 Fenix has cabin, FBW doesn’t = 1 Fenix point. Also, MSFS has too many childhood deseases and lacks features for serious simmers. Overhead-main-pedestal of the A320 FBW and Phenix. I understand that GSX is different and cheaper than the others. See where I’m going at here? Everything that Fenix has, and FBW doesn’t will be a score tipping towards Fenix. FBW A32X is more than enough to learn all systems and how to fly airliner. Takeoff perf calculation is about 20 kts too slow. My major focus since joining Fenix has not just been the aircraft systems, but also the software and infrastructure around the product I am currently using the FBW A320 neo, I enjoy using it but it feels like it is missing something. a Co-pilot is great, but I’d rather have the depth of systems of the FENIX / FBW / PMDG /BAE-146 (limited Co-pilot) MD82 and leave that to FS2Crew (Sorry XBOX flyers) I want a flight simulator not a Pilot simulator. The systems on the A320 make it surprisingly easy to master enough to get it from A to B after a few flights. Real Airbus A320 FBW delay between stick input and servovalve initial movement is around 80 milliseconds. The After a (somewhat) successful flight with the Fenix A320. A If you like the ease of interaction with the Fenix (or What's the Difference Between the FBW-A320 and the new Fenix A320? upvotes FENIX A320 vs. Alot of love went into both. All very well, no problem. Hope that makes sense, but from 737 vs FBW A320 Fenix A320, if you could only pick one, get the 737. I bought the Fenix A320 on day one, had to reconfigure the peripherals and then done three flights. Aerosoft vs fslabs vs flightfactor vs toliss vs fenix vs flybywire vs perfect flight Whats the best Airbus plane from these developers? For free FBW is excellent. . I have read a lot on this forum about how great the FBW A320 is and I am really wondering if it makes sense for a primarily 737 guy to buy the Fenix if the F Hey guys, the new Fenix A320 is coming out soon, and I wanted to hear from folks that are in the know what makes the Fenix A320 stand apart from the great (free) FlyByWire A320? most of the other threads are very old on FBW A320 is in steady development without a definitive time schedule. My tl;dr conclusion is: Fenix is overrated, and before anyone jumps to my throat, it is a fantastic product and the pricing is terrific but its reputation exceeds what it delivers. Fenix is a payware product, FBW and Ini A320 are not. The positive side is that the Terrain Display is working, which is nice if you So if you can take the performance hit of the Fenix and can afford to buy it use the Fenix. But I wanted to expand my skills a bit, so a week ago I got the FBW A320, and watched a bunch of videos to get up to Fenix is a better company with a more in-depth systems + flight dynamics then Toliss will ever be. Depending on how long Fenix will support the A320 it might happen that FBW will end up with more features and system depth at some point. I’m starting a flight on the Fenix So far, based on my initial assessment on the cockpit model. #airbus #msfs2020 #fenixa320 #flybywire #flybywirea320 #msfs #microsoft Buy the Fenix if you want a really good A320 now. Can’t get to my PC at the moment to give stats but have noticed no major difference visually between the Fenix and FBW since the last Fenix update. So yes, the poster is a pepega. Skip to main content. And I have seen lots doing Streams LIVE knocking FBW why? answer that. Cognita. I know there are a lot of differences between the FBW and Fenix, it is a great option if you can only afford, or want to buy, one of the two. And, I'm also considering Fenix A320. I want the Fenix because I like having variety, but the 737 is something different, and its a smaller model ( -700) and opens up new routes that the A320 doesn’t or can’t fly. I switch myself for and back between FBW and the Fenix. all rights reserved. MSFS2020 Comparaison FENIX A320 FBW A32NX 2 -Le test sur le Fenix A320J'ai besoin d'aide pour l'Approche RNAV Although a relatively new addition to the Fenix team (mid 2023), I’ve been in the professional Flight Sim development space since the early 2010s, and a Fenix user since the first alpha builds of the A320. Like i said before i would rather pay for the FBW A320 because these guys have worked so Hard getting it out and giving it to us. Don't be this guy, not everyone drops It’s a very decent aircraft, comparable with FBW (visibly worse than Fenix but then again, 95% addons are). I can highly recommend the Fenix, but if you need sth really new, try the PMDG first. But, the performance of the FlyByWire is better. Tons of liveries for the FBW too! Personally, I’d check out the FBW A320 before spending a cent on either. Bear in mind as well though that the FBW is modelling a Neo, the Fenix will be modelling the 'classic' A320. So, So, what is the better choice between fenix a320 vs flybywire? Between Fenix A320 and FlyByWire, Fenix A320 is more realistic and can render better. I’m currently using FSX with the Jeehell A320 FMGS add-on. For me, the tight integration of the Fenex EFB and MCDU with Simbrief flight plans and Had small break from the flight sim - what is general consensus regarding the FBW A32X vs iniBuilds A32X? Which one offers more "immersive" experience right now in terms of system depth, textures, sounds, integrations - I fly both fbw and Fenix as I like to recreate real routes with the same identical aircraft. Considering the PMDG 737 is a rework of their P3D version and the FBW A320 uses the default Asobo A320N that has a lot of inconsistencies and wrong measurements. Open comment sort options Just a few shots / FBW A320 (Turkish Airlines Fenix A320 by some margin. Revisiting the FBW after about of a year of Flying the Fenix! An option I don't see get kicked around a lot, is buying the 737, and using the FBW A320. First, before giving my quick opinion, I think it's amazing we're living in a flight sim age where three such terrific planes are available to users, and including the FBW's ecosystem of the LVFR A319/A321 and Headwind A330 even more Fenix est fini, FBW en cours de dev. In the intro of the post here you can read what I have achieved so far. The NEO has the rear circuit breaker board behind the copilot seat with no labels and no function, in the Fenix all circuit breakers are While the Fenix is great, no doubt, it took a real performance hit for me in SU14 for some reason and still has, IMHO, funky and unpredictable flight dynamics once you get below 50 feet in landing vs the FBW (which IRL Airbus pilots on YouTube have agreed with) which I really, REALLY hope gets fixed in the upcoming big Fenix update. The Fenix is just so much more detailed. The NEO has the rear overhead circuit breaker illuminated, the Fenix has it dark at night. The FBW for me, mostly feels very plastic. All the factors that I concern are flight dynamics (aerodynamical similarity when it is compared to real A320 or Level-D FFS) Thus, which one is best for my purpose? I heard that basic flight dynamic in Xplane 11 is better than P3D, but I found lots of opinions that fslabs A320 has the best performance. I’m still in study phase. I would very much like to make the transition to MSFS and wondered what the Fenix A320 is like compared to the FsLabs A320? Is it the same study level? Thanks Also FBW as well as iniBuild A310 are very good Edited January 7, 2023 by omarsmak30. Aerosoft is more of an Airbus light Right now the FBW A320 is awesome! I highly recommend you download the FBW installer from their website. If you want a better performance or a freeware product use the FBW A320 (performs The FBW has a better EFB, very good sounds, and uses a different version of the FCU A320 software than the Fenix. I have to admit that my entire experience is 95% the same as with flying the FBW A32NX. Fenix A320 won't have this problem as it only will have 3-5 FPS less than the default Download AweSun Remote Desktop: https://dada. FBW is a distant last place for now :(. Which one should I get? comments sorted by Best Top New PMDG 737 by far - Great flight model, great performance PC wise, realistic, customizable, used by a ton of airlines. Even on an RTX 3080, these kinds of discrepancies in performance can mean the difference between an enjoyable experience and an unplayable one in VR. I really enjoy the FBW and haven't felt a need to upgrade to the Fenix, yet. VNAV is operational on the FBW experimental version. Fenix A320 has higher fidelity, all systems operational, and cabin is fully rendered. The PMDG 737’s are great and getting IRL A320 pilot here, I think it’s worth it over the fbw, it has to be the closest to the real thing I’ve tried personally, all things considered. There's zero arguments in favor or against buying the Fenix, only an obvious statement, that the FBW A320 is free. ; if you're regularly flying and enjoying the FBW, Also not to forget they're planning to bring different variations of the a320 family. My advice is talk to FBW on their Discord. MSFS gives you realistic graphics and Fenix A320. Unfortunately, this add-on is not available on FS2020, so I have to look for another realistic A320 simulator. Here’s a video of my flight yesterday at the top of descent and I use the VNAV Managed descent all the way down without issues. That's about it. youtube. The positive side is that the Terrain Display is working, which is nice if you want to do a lot of tricky approach like Paro. In terms of AP I found the FBW LNAV does some strange things, Fenix VNAV is not perfect and they both have some glitches here and there. Seems like more fun / learning to have the PMDG 737 AND the free FBW A320 than just the Fenix and the FBW (both A320s). The FBW has VNAV I think it still needs some tweaks, but it works very well. There are massive differences for those aiming for 1:1 real life. I’m doing currently my type rating on A320 in Europe and I fell in love with Airbus. FENIX yes I purchased it so flaming what. It only starts to get different at the edges of the envelope. Fenix's A320 is way more sluggish on the While I have installed both the FBW and Fenex versions of the A320, I have found myself using the Fenex bird almost exclusively. I’m impressed by FBW In the FBW A320, this is simulated by pressing the CALLS ALL button on the left of the overhead panel. From what I can tell (others can correct me though), the wear and tear, failures, and minor extra MDCU features weren't enough for me to care about. so not as little as what’s shown in Fenix, but perhaps not as much as FBW. All the aircraft I think the question is less "do I want to learn something super deep" and more "do I like airliner flying in general;" you don't need to know every switch and procedure to enjoy the FBW or the Fenix, it's more about whether you're into the defining characteristics of airliners like flight planning, FMS manipulation, ILS landings, etc. My biggest gripe is the performance - I tried a few airports (of various sizes and with FSLTL traffic) in ini320 and Fenix and the framerate difference in The better comparison would be the the ini vs the FBW 320 Neo Reply reply SuperHills92 • I haven’t done a flight in it yet but the modelling is great - the performance is a bit bad, on my end at least. And in the FBW, apart from proper working VNAV implementation, most of the simulation for normal procedures are there. After a (somewhat) successful flight with the Fenix A320. The textures, systems, sounds, flight model etc. FBW models SO much accurately, all for free! Should you get the Fenix A320 or stick with the freeware FlybyWire A320 NEO? I have a look at the features that each plane has over the other, and what makes The FBW A320 is fantastic for freeware and if it was payware would fetch a good price, but the Fenix is several steps up from that and possibly the best airliner in MSFS. Edited May 23, 2024 by RALF9636 Documentation for that is really good, and new features to make it work just like the actual A320 Neo (the Fenix is an older A320 CEO) are constantly being added, and a new model and textures will be done after FBW has released the A380 which is being worked on (for now the model is based on the original Asobo A320 Neo). I also just like the engines and handling characteristics of the 737 compared to the A320 - its a muscly, powerful plane and it lets you know that. Not saying the fenix A320 isn't, but most people can't tell the difference between FBW and Fenix. I am hoping that Fenix improves this feature. But like I said, the Fenix A320 is a wonderful aircraft, and the most complete Airbus aircraft in MSFS right now. When it was released, it was considered leaps and bounds better than Asobo’s default A320. I seem to remember seeing benchmark stats between the PMDG and the Fenix since the update and there wasn’t a lot in it so if your PMDG runs fine you should also be fine with the Fenix. I am concerned about the Fenixs development, though. As you also notice is that the FBW has massive impact on the performance. I’m building my own home cockpit. Is it worth buying full price or should I wait for a sale. PILOTE DE LIGNE. I like both (obviously I haven’t spent as much time with Fenix as FBW)! But here are some of the things I like and don’t like as much about Fenix compared to FBW: The texture detail in Fenix is awesome and makes the plane feel very real; I like the functional doors, stairs, GPU, etc. The Fenix is superior to FBW and the Asobo A320 isn’t even in the same ball field as either. Buy the 737 if you're willing to wait for the FBW to become really good. Posted September 18, The fenix a320 seems to have a noticeable delay between input and the aircraft responding to the movement whereas the fbw a320 and Toliss a321 do not have such a delay. So when you add things up that Fenix has that FBW doesn’t. However, I do have the PMDG 737 and love it. Yes the Fenix is slightly more in depth but it is not "far superior and complex" compared to the PMDG 737. The sound pack in the Fenix is insanely good. Fenix is awesome and I fly it most of the time but absolute beginner might not appreciate all little details in it. This will set the "Cabin Ready" status as shown in the ECAM. Messages 517 Plus, the A320 is the perfect aircraft to start learning to fly Airbuses as the A340 has a bit more systems complexity compared to the A320, so it will be a steeper learning curve. Honestly I was hoping that Fenix will have a better performance/fps than FBW as I was thinking FBW is responsible for some of the stutters in the game. By SimianFlu September 18, 2024 in Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020/2024) Share it is an absolute no brainer if you want to fly the A320 series. I like with the FBW I don't have to TEMP INS a waypoint change. Fenix has circuit breakers, FBW doesn’t = 1 Fenix point. FBW A320: 100% FNX A320: 115% AS CRJ: 120% Default C172: 130% And let me add that - other than the FBW - the Fenix is perfectly smooth, no stutters. All the system behaviours, attention to details, sub systems, failures, engine modelling FBW is really really good and it certainly is "enough" for A to B hops, Vatsim etc. To avoid discussions about what framerate is acceptable I give just percentages with the FBW being 100. I let you discover this little work it is necessary to have the Touch Portal Pro version application to BOBSK8 MSFS 2020 , PMDG 777 ,PMDG 737-600-800, Fenix A320, FSLTL, TrackIR , Avliasoft EFB2 , Beyond ATC , Flightsim First Officer A320,777,737. I would hold out - plus late this year the block 2 updates are coming from Fenix which will give us engine options, sharklets, a better exterior model etc. Sort by: Best. Once we get the long promised free update (due in weeks not months they say) it’s going to level up even more with a number of simulation firsts. Scott Griffiths. com/IntotheBlueSimDonate Via Paypa Just today flew the same quick flight (KSAN to KLAS) with the default V2 IniBuilds A320, the FBW, and the Fenix. I have always wondered what the best airbus simulation on the market today, as the fenix A320 came out I have been wanting to ask to this. Become a Channel Member: https://www. The A32NX looks clean and brand new which is what I Summary AI Generated. PMDG B737 - Which one has more, the better over all package and a better future? upvotes But it is already apparent you are extremely biased towards the Fenix lol. Fenix EFB: Fenix's EFB has some really cool stuff like a takeoff performance calculator that can help you choose flap setting, FLEX TEMP, and so on. Citation. So if you can take the performance hit of the Fenix and can afford to buy it use the Fenix. They are both nicely made, although main difference I noticed is that the Fenix has better solid fmc/autopilot/McDu systems, all route lines are perfectly My tl;dr conclusion is: Fenix is overrated, and before anyone jumps to my throat, it is a fantastic product and the pricing is terrific but its reputation exceeds what it delivers. Les réactions: androl2015. Fenix has animated break fans, FBW doesn’t = 1 Fenix point. It has LNAV, it can do ILS/RNAV approaches. MSFS LIVE | Asobo A320, FBW A32NX, Fenix A320 Comparison | Which is better?We will be doing SUMMR2 STOKD SERFR SERFR4 3 X in a row on each a320 varient air Fenix however definitely has graphics, and its systems are in depth and is made by an open dev team who are willing to admit mistakes, the fenix activation process is alot simpler than FF, also msfs will improve alot as each update occurs same goes for the Fenix a320, many real pilots on youtube have also made videos that you can use to have a I’d get the PMDG, it’s totally different than the A320 that’s already well covered by the FBW A320. I took some time to compare both with the same flights, settings, etc. The amount of people on this sub saying "FBW is free" every time someone mentions Fenix A320 is beyond sickening. It's the easiest way to get the aircraft into MSFS. 4. It is clear the Fenix is going to be more complete at this stage as to why that should be obvious. The A32NX Project is a community-driven open-source project to create a free Airbus A320neo in Microsoft Flight Simulator that is as close to reality as possible. The Airbus FBW control laws were designed to make flying the aircraft to be as natural as possible. I get better framerates in the Fenix. com)? I can't enter the V-speeds before I have that, any help would be appreciated. Fenix is The FBW A32NX feels more responsive and smoother to fly when autopilot is disconnected and is generally way more FPS friendly for my system. I would be curious to hear your feedback on the FBW compared to the Fenix. This is much more of a testament to the FBW team than any detriment to the Fenix team. Edited May 26, 2022 by Ray Proudfoot Fenix tag added. The things I listed that Fenix does miss, PMDG doesn't. The PMDG is solid but shows it's older roots in some areas. FlyByWire is free where as Fenix Get FBW A32X or even better Fenix A320 To be honest I wouldn't recommend buying Fenix for someone who is brand new. So FBW A32NX has delivered to me that high-tech feeling that Fenix A320 doesn’t. The awesome thing is it includes ACARS, allows you to “contact your company,” for weather, ATIS, text other FBW A320 Aircraft and through the FMC with Sim Bridge. Besides that, it's about perfect. FBW isn't bad but the bass and richness of the Fenix is soooooo immersive. It started out as an enhancement project to the default A320neo and is now proceeding as an independent add-on project aiming to bring the FlyByWire A32NX up to payware-level systems Not a direct comparison of the TL to the Fenix, but more so a question of how close is the TL A21N to the real A21N versus how close the Fenix A320 is to the real A320? I have the Fenix, but debating also getting the A21N for XP. it's by far my favourite at the moment but I'll still use the A320 Fenix is a better simulation of the real A320. But let’s not get too hasty with the FBW. The missing callouts in the Fenix are a tad annoying, granted they are optional in the 320 but still the FBW has them. The Fenix is definitely better than the FBW but until you really learn the FBW you probably won’t notice all that much. The Fenix will be (should be) a complete product and you should be able to rely on the systems. FBW has the same goal of complete fidelity in the end, it doesn’t One of the biggest differences I notice are the sounds. Just managed to do my first flight ever with a Fenix A320 and it's been the most wholesome experience in my whole gaming life upvotes © 2024 fenixsim ltd. Three aircraft, all targeting the same short-mid haul flight market, but which of the three is the best optimised for MSFS 2020 in its current state? The det Not talking about pc performance stuff or fenix vs pmdg. The biggest issue with the Fenix for me is the FM, my feeling was “this plane is fighting against the Asobo FM”, very twitchy and at some points it didn’t feel as flybywire as the FBW mod. link/fomIHfGet 7-Day Remote Game Trial: 4TBA5ZWS3I, Only 200! Reward link: https://dada. Even comes with a printer, for you to print off your atis and other text messages. privacy notice · terms and conditions · terms and conditions I’ve been quite exclusively using the FBW A320 as my go-to airliner since it’s introduction two years ago. Check correct FLAPS setting (must be in line with PERF TAKE OFF page) Check V 1, V R, V 2 speeds and also, if required, FLX temperature setting (PERF TAKE OFF page) Check Squawk Many of us Love the FBW A320 and the FBW guys gave it us for FREE. Did my first flight with the aircraft yesterday, did the same procedures I do with FBW and the flight was terryble. And the detailing on the exterior model is amazing. But I want to make the step to FS2020. But those who don't need a license-level-simulation the FBW is alright. Hi simmers, I am a casual airline pilot wondering if the Fenix A320 would be a worthy addition to my growing fleet - I pretty much only fly APL2 low-cost short/med routes for Canadian and US airlines (Air Transat, Rouge, Frontier, etc) and have had my eye on the Fenix for some time as there seems to be no other solid A320ceo option out there. I still really like Boeing but A320 vs 737 topic, A320 for sure! Such a fantastic plane, really well designed by genius people from scratch P3D feels extremely dated and unrealistic compared to X-Plane. FBW is not bad but they still have annoying bugs for example in the Autopilot, I don't think they will ever reach Toliss/FSLabs quality. Immersion factor Fenix vs FBW Immersion factor Fenix vs FBW. It's what I did. For now I'm split between the PMDG 737/Fenix & occasionally the ini a310. So I would say if you like automation, go for the A320 - the Fenix is probably the best implemented of the two from a software standpoint (except for performance, PMDG seems to win there). Full passenger cabin with nice window textures is awesome. The cabin rendering is nice too. Things come when they're ready. But the Fenix is just on another level. I really hope we had FBW systems with Inibuilds exterior model and cabin. These are the basics of a study level The ones that stood out for me were the Fenix A320 and t Hey! I recently got Microsoft Flight Simulator and am currently flying the freeware FlyByWire Airbus a32nx I was thinking of getting some quality payware aircraft. If you want a better performance or a freeware product use the FBW A320 (performs about 10-15% better than the Fenix on my system). Share Add a Comment. Abdelsp. Super happy to have bought the Fenix A320 although I have to say that the guys from the FBW team did a huge job, but from now on the FBW A320 will remain in the hangar. Hey guys, the new Fenix A320 is coming out soon, and I wanted to hear from folks that are in the know what makes the Fenix A320 stand apart from the great (free) FlyByWire A320? most of the other threads are very old on The Fenix A320 might just push FSL out of the top tier for airbuses to buy for flight simulation. Is this intentional or is it a problem in my end. Also, the traffic injector on their installer is awesome too. Just managed to do my first flight ever with a Fenix A320 If you can fly the FBW you can fly the Fenix as well. There are also a lot more routes and approaches you can fly with the A320 which aren’t possible with the A340 due to Probably. FBW est ouvert aux home cockpits, à l'export des MCDU & co, Fenix non (même si en bricolant on peut faire des choses) Fenix documente la façon d'interfacer son A320 avec des throttles, Yoke etc Va comprendre Charles. (i find the fenix lights dim compared to fbw or pmdg for instance I am so tempted to buy the Fenix A320, the price is excellent and the plane looks spectacular. And everything that I need to do on my flight has been fulfilled by FBW A32NX. Touch portal file for FBW and Fenix A320. Nothing else changed. How is the inibuilds A320 compared to the fbw. FLAPS/THS in FBW A320 (MSFS2020) Question I am currently trying to get the MCDU settings done and I am not sure what is supposed to go into the FLAPS/THS field. Do I need a calculator for that or is that somewhere in the flight plan (made one with simbrief. The wings in A320 definitely move a lot during taxi, turbulence, etc. For me the Fenix feels a bit more polished, but the FBW has also some features I like (cabin announcements to name one of several). patreon. 1 AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, 64GB DDR5 6000MHZ RAM, RTX 2080Super G-YMML1 But in the end i would say that there are big differences between the Fenix A320 and FBW A32NX. Expect 5~10 less fps than the FBW tho at the moment, hopefully this will improve with updates. Im just curious- After flying both the 737 and the A320. It was giving me 123 kts V2 when at the same weight in the Fenix it was 143. Heck you can even go for the A320 FBW which is itself better then anything Toliss shits out with their overpriced garbage The FBW A320 is in terms of Normal operations 80-90% of what you would expect from a study level A320. While I am really enjoying the Fenix A320, there are a quite a few features and options I greatly miss not having that are available in the FlyByWire A320 Ne Both A32NX and Fenix A320 are quite good in terms of flight modeling, but there is something that the other doesn't have. OP don't listen to the comments. And the newest update they had fixed the performance issues that people were seeing with the Fenix. ndc ksfk uplejj abkub aarnogp goroa rzb yrzy qgohzl gmdpgt